Showing posts with label goals. Show all posts
Showing posts with label goals. Show all posts

Saturday, February 23, 2013

They Aren't Called Attitude Suggestions (Part 1 of ?)

          For the past ten plus years, I have had the honor and privilege of running a martial arts school alongside my wife, who has always put nothing less than the utmost effort into making sure that our school, our instructors, and our students strive for improvement, regardless of how long that improvement might take.  Recently, she has initiated a plan that will take over a year to reach its ultimate fruition, but one that is nonetheless both necessary and overdue.  Many of our younger students will not, at present, be able to understand the full scope of this plan, nor will they immediately comprehend its benefits.  To them, the final results will not be realized for what they perceive as "a long time."  
          Before I discuss the plan itself, I remind you that I am, at my core, little more than a geek, and as such, my view is always skewed toward geek culture when making connections to the world beyond the martial arts, if such a world actually exists for those of us who choose to walk the path of the martial arts instructor.  That said, the best way I can relate this plan to others may be through referencing a work many still believe to be the greatest work of  Fantasy Literature ever produced: J.R.R. Tolkien's Lord of The Rings.  In particular, I would like to make note of one of Tolkien's most interesting characters.  No, I'm not referring to any of the Hobbits, Dwarves, Elves, Goblins, or Wizards.  The character in question is the Ent, Treebeard.  I realize that at this point many readers will have no idea what an Ent is, or who Treebeard is, but trust me, even if you have never read the novels or seen the films, Treebeard is cool.

Trust me: Treebeard is cool.

          In The Two Towers, Treebeard is encountered by the hobbits Merry and Pippin.  In the film version, he tells them (eventually) after taking several hours to say "Good Morning" to the other Ents that, "it takes a long time to say anything in Old Entish, and we never say anything unless it is worth taking a long time to say."  Interestingly enough, the novel actually casts a slightly different light on this speech. In the novel, Treebeard says, "It is a lovely language, but it takes a very long time saying anything in it, because we do not say anything IN IT, unless it is worth taking a long time to say, AND TO LISTEN TO." (Emphasis added)
          Wait, wasn't I supposed to be talking about the martial arts, and my wife's plan?  I am, of course- weren't you paying attention?  If we replace a few of the verbs, and the language of Old Entish with the words "martial arts", we begin to see the point, that being:

We don't say or do anything in the martial arts unless it is worth 
taking a long time to say or do, and to pay attention to.   

I do realize that I ended the above point with a preposition, but so did Tolkien, so you'll just have to forgive me.  Now, go back and read it again, and take your time.  It wasn't a suggestion; I actually want you to do it.  Really.  Why are you still reading this part?  I said go back and read it again. Done? Okay, then I suppose we can proceed with the plan.
         The plan, simply put, is to have our classes, and in particular our youth advanced classes, learn, understand, and put into practice each of the 14 Attitude Requirements of Tang Soo Do.  Why then should this take such "a long time?"  The answer is because the plan requires us to spend at least one month working on each one of the 14 requirements. Our students must not only learn the words, but must also make a solid attempt each month to understand what those words actually mean, and must show the instructors a genuine attempt to put them into practice.  Oh, did I forget to mention?  This is also cumulative.  For example, by Month 3, students must still be able to recite and explain Attitude Requirements One and Two.  By Month 14, our goal is that each student who has made an effort will be able to recite all 14 Attitude Requirements, explain to the instructors' satisfaction what each means, and give concrete examples of what they have done to actively fulfill each requirement, all of which can be found listed here.  Does this all sound like a bit too much to ask of a child?  I'll be painfully blunt: If you really think so, your child doesn't belong in my class.
          They aren't called the 14 Attitude Suggestions.  They are requirements.  If you don't meet the minimum requirements, you don't move forward.  It's really that simple, but what the heck?  Let's go ahead and make it complicated anyway.  What, exactly, is a requirement?  Dictionary.com defines the word requirement  as:

a thing demanded or obligatory

and also as:
  
a need or necessity

If we accept these 14 Attitude Requirements at face value, we begin to understand that:

1. We must demand that our students learn, understand, and fulfill each requirement.

2. We must convince our students that they are obligated to do so.

3. We must help our students identify the specific need associated with and fulfilled by each requirement.
 
Notice that I used the word must in each of the above statements.  Remember: they're not suggestions.  Not only must we do all of the above, but we must also insist on doing the same for ourselves.  Children understand hypocrisy, and they hate it.  Demand no more of them than you demand of yourself.
          When I am able to put Part 2 of this post series into coherent words, I will begin to discuss the Attitude Requirements themselves.  Let's look at Attitude Requirement Number One just to see how big the plan really is:

Purpose of training should be enhancement of mental and physical betterment. 

Throw that one at your class of youth students, pre-teens, teenagers, or even adults, and watch their eyes bug out of their heads. Then try to explain it, and proceed to scratch your own head.  Each word in this requirement is carefully chosen and carefully placed, though, and it all makes sense.  At the risk of making yet another somewhat obscure reference, I'll leave you with a quote from a somewhat underrated film starring Danny DeVito: Renaissance Man:
Jamaal: Are you gonna come translate this for us?

Bill: Why? It's in English.



Kick. Punch. Easy Stuff.
 

Thursday, January 31, 2013

What's In a Test? Part 1: Failure

          Some time ago now, I found myself for the first time having to write an extended thesis in order to fulfill my requirements for advancement to 4th Dan. While this blog isn't the place to share that particular document in its entirety, I do think it is appropriate for me to share pieces of it here.  The basic topic of the the thesis was testing, and here I would like to share my thoughts on what too often seems to be a taboo word and a taboo subject in the realms of martial arts tests: Failure.

Fear of Failure

            The possibility of failure must be present in any test, or it cannot truly be called a test.  Beyond the possibility of failure, however, a good test includes the fear of failure as well.  Fear in and of itself is not a bad thing.  It can, in fact, be a powerful motivator towards positive change.  We become stronger through facing our fears, not by ignoring or attempting to remove them.  The trend today, however, seems to be towards removing any perceived unpleasantness from our young people’s experiences. Columnist Tucker Carlson writes:

Not all of life’s experiences are positive.  Many are downright unpleasant, even painful, and always have been.  What’s new is the attempt to prohibit those experiences.1

In so doing, we are doing our children harm.  One of the established needs for testing to fill is the need to confront and understand our weaknesses.  If we do not confront our fears, and in particular the fear of failure, we can never truly face or come to terms with these weaknesses.  In short, fear is a necessary human motivator, and the fear of failure is a necessary component of a good test.
            The fear of failure has been a trait common to all people throughout history.  It stems from the life and death experiences of our distant ancestors, the so called ‘dangers of the hunt’, in which failing meant serious injury or even death.2  Later, as Rites of Passage became more formalized and controlled, failure to succeed in meeting the objective of the rite meant denial of acceptance into the adult community.  With failure came consequences, and it was these consequences of which people were fearful.  Today there is a trend towards lessening or complete removal of consequences.  At one time, failure at tests in schools meant a dire combination of consequences for the child.  At school, the failure would, at the least, result in a loss of points toward an overall score, lowering the student’s chance of passing a subject overall.  At home, parental disapproval was virtually guaranteed.  These and other consequences worked together to ensure that the student would not want to repeat the process.  Today, however, the consequences are often removed or lessened.  Parents more and more often confront teachers over failing grades, rather than support them. Schools themselves allow students to take tests as many times as they need to in order to pass, where the end result is no consequence for the initial failure, and in fact a reward of a passing grade in the end.  With waning support from the community and families, schools are beginning to find out that the consequences they do try to implement have little effect on the students.  The fear of consequences is not reinforced outside of the schools, and the fear of failure is beginning to disappear. Attempts to combat this trend are not working as planned.
            We have discussed the fact that with failure must come consequences.  Removal of these consequences is a problem.  It is, however, only half of the problem.  Attempts to recreate some sense of a fear of failure have been centered solely on consequences, making them consistently harsher. So-called ‘zero tolerance’ policies are being put in place in schools and places of employment throughout society, in which failure is automatically coupled with harsh consequences, and repeated failure is accompanied with immediate removal. In these situations, failure is the end of the road. Consequences must be in place, true, but they must serve as motivators towards positive change.  This cannot happen if the consequences of failure are not coupled with opportunity. Failure must not be viewed as the end of the road, but the beginning.  We often will learn more from our failures than from our successes, but only if the opportunity for future success exists.
People who fail to succeed at a test, life experience, or other situation, must be actively encouraged to face, understand, and accept the consequences of their failure, rather than simply be left to those consequences without further assistance.  In this way, and only in this way, can we fully prepare them to face the test again, hopefully with a different result. Testing a second time without first facing the initial consequences accomplishes little or nothing in the long run.  We do not encourage success by removing the consequences of failure, nor do we encourage success by forcing people to deal with those consequences unaided.  Lao Tzu tells us: “In pursuing their affairs, people often fail when they are close to success.”3  This occurs when people are left to face the consequences of failure with no help and do not recognize the chance to correct the initial mistakes they made.  Aikido instructor and author Kensho Furuya states:

We do not fail because we make mistakes, we fail because we do not make mistakes correctly.

The common person turns his mistake into a bigger mistake.  The wise man turns his mistake into an advantage.4

We must encourage students to accept the consequences of their failure, but never to accept the failure itself.  We must help them to see that failure is not the end of the road, but merely a step along the longer road to success.
            A good test is one that has consequences for failure.  A complete test, however, includes a mechanism for the test-taker to come to acceptance of the consequences of failure and confront the test again. We must recreate a sense of danger associated with failure.  Without that sense, without that fear, there is ultimately nothing learned from failure.  It becomes an acceptable result.  This cannot be allowed.  We must push students beyond their failures.  By forcing them to confront the consequences of their failures, we force them to accept the fear of a second failure, but also to now work through that fear to a point where failure is no longer an acceptable outcome.  We must force today’s students to confront their fear of failure.  
          In some instances, the fear of failure has been too far removed from the martial arts tests of today.  This happens when students see everyone pass every test and assume that passing the test is automatic.  The basic concept is that no one who is not ready to be tested should be allowed to test, and therefore everyone passes.  There is nothing wrong with this idea as a concept, but many time ideal concepts are difficult to translate into the "real world",  and when instructors do not warn students and parents that the possibility of failure is very real, or when they allow unprepared students to ‘slide by,’ problems begin to appear.  Martial arts instructors today have been accused of ‘giving away’ and even ‘selling’ belts.  These phrases imply that the belts given to students were never actually earned through passing a challenging test.  We must strive never to allow ourselves to do this, or we remove a critical component of a complete test.
          The martial arts test must remain a test with clear and tangible consequences for failure. Rather than serving as a method of punishment, these consequences exist in order to drive students towards positive changes.  Failure in a martial arts test will result from a lack of mental, physical, or spiritual preparation and development.  Any one of these can cause the failure, but all failures of the martial arts test result in one major consequence: no promotion to the next level.  This consequence has a tangible component in that the student who fails the test does not receive a new belt, stripe, or certification, but perhaps it is the more intangible results that really make the difference.  As martial artists advance in rank, new levels of authority, status, privilege, and responsibility are (or at least should be) conferred.  The student who fails his or her test will find that his or her own levels in each of these areas remain the same.  Nothing is taken away from the student, but nothing is gained either.  It is the lack of advancement in these intangible areas that students should fear most, and this then becomes the driving force for positive development.  Instructors will fuel this motivation by helping students learn from their failures, thereby teaching the next generation to confront these failures and use them as motivation rather than to simply accept them.  Students learn to have a healthy amount of fear of failure, but are constantly encouraged to confront and overcome that fear.  Only once they have done so can it be said that they have truly earned the status that comes with advancement in rank.

Kick. Punch.  Easy Stuff.




1.      Carlson, Tucker. (2002). “Go Ahead, Hurt My Feelings,” Reader’s Digest, August, p. 46.

2.      ‘Dangers of the Hunt’ concept taken from Pinnock, Don. (1996). “Gangs Guns, and Rites of Passage,” Conflict Resolution Notes, Fall p. 8.

3.      Lao Tzu, trans. by Victor H. Mair. (1990). Tao Te Ching New York: Bantam Book), p. 35.

4.      Furuya, Kensho. (1996). Kodo: Ancient Ways Santa Clarita, CA: Ohara Publications, Inc., p. 139, and  p. 144.


Tuesday, January 29, 2013

You Keep Wanting That Belt. I Do Not Think It Means What You Think It Means.

          The movie The Princess Bride may be one of the few great comedic masterpieces ever put on film.  It is not only extremely enjoyable, but also extraordinarily well written, directed, and acted, and if nothing else, is eminently quotable. For the uninitiated: Throughout the beginning portion of the film, after the character Vizzini abducts Princess Buttercup and finds that he is being pursued, he continually exclaims that this is "Inconceivable!", despite all evidence to the contrary. After one "Inconceivable!" too many, Inigo Montoya astutely responds, "You keep using that word.  I do not think it means what you think it means."
          As a martial arts instructor, I find myself feeling much the same way when it comes to how students seem to feel about achieving new rank.  It appears that somewhere along the line, the goals for many students have shifted away from acquiring knowledge and skill towards merely acquiring rank.  To these students, the belt has become a symbol of only accomplishment, status, and achievement.  It has become a measuring tool to say, "Look at me, and look at what I've done! I've worked hard, and I deserve your admiration!"  Now, I'm not here to deny that it is these things, to a certain degree, but as an instructor, that's really NOT what your belt means to me.  The belt is not a destination, and making it one simply makes it that much easier to end a journey that isn't supposed to end. (See There Is No Karate Season)  Reaching any new rank is not a destination, it is merely another step; another rung on the ladder.  What is it, then, that your belt means to me?  It is not about what you have learned.  It is instead about what you are ready to learn next.  It is not about where you have been, it is about where you are going.  The new belt, quite simply, means that you are ready for more.
          It is this attitude that should be reflected in any desire for advancement, and in any efforts expended during a test for new rank.  I do not want to see a simple regurgitation of required material.  I want to see a true desire to advance, to move forward, and to be ready for the next challenge.  Frankly, it amazes me when the attitude presented is anything less.  All too often, when students realize that achieving a new belt rank doesn't make anything easier, I see the last thing I would expect on their faces: confusion.  I'm not sure why this is such a secret, though.  It seems as if these students, somewhat like Vizzini, find it to be "Inconceivable" that their new belts did not come fully equipped with magical abilities to make training simpler and easier, or at very least seem shocked that they don't now possess all the answers and abilities they will ever need.  Life doesn't work this way, and neither do the martial arts.  Prove proficiency with one thing, or at one job, and the reward, inevitably, is simply the opportunity to prove you can do more, and do it better.  This then, is also your reward upon receiving new rank.  
          Prove you can learn more.  Prove you can do that which you have already learned better.  Prove your belt means what you think it means.  Anything else should be inconceivable.


Kick. Punch. Easy Stuff.





Saturday, March 10, 2012

The Black Belt Curriculum: Low Block is Awesome

        As we have outlined in the previous post, understanding an Advanced Concept comes from starting with a single technique and exploring many different characteristics of that given technique.  This may be an analysis of the collected Um and Yang characteristics of a given technique (push/pull, tension/relaxation, upswing/downswing, etc.), could focus on the areas of greatest strength and weakness of the technique, or may delve into varying applications of a single technique.  For the purpose of this initial example, we will choose the following Advanced Concept:

One Basic Technique may have a nearly infinite number of possible applications.

In order to better understand this, we will use the following verbal device, which students will repeat, in order to convey this concept:

“A block is a strike is a trap is a lock is a throw.”

By using this device, we begin to get our students to think beyond the limiting basic terminology to which they have been exposed, and allow them to begin thinking of their techniques not only in their simplest defensive forms, but as offensive and immobilizing tools as well.
            We start to deconstruct this Advanced Concept with the first part of our verbal learning device: a block.  For the purposes of this thesis, we will assume that a “block” refers to any use of a technique that stops, deflects, or redirects an incoming attack but does not immobilize the attacker or inflict damage to a traditional vital point.  It is important to note that while blocks can and do inflict damage, they can be differentiated from strikes in that they are both primarily defensive in nature and do not typically directly attack the main vital points of the body.   The typical “low block” then, as it is taught to a white belt, is explained as a technique that uses a downward swinging and rotating arm in order to stop or deflect an oncoming attack with the Ulnar side of the defender’s forearm.  The typical example is one in which an attacker executes a low to mid-level kick, and the defender intercepts this attack with the forearm, as depicted below:


Limiting the application of this block to one single attack is somewhat shortsighted, though. When we begin to examine the path of the low block, we see that it can be effectively used against not only a variety of oncoming kick attacks, but also against striking hand attacks and grabs.  When we begin to stress the properties of hip twisting and initial hand positioning prior to the execution of the block, this becomes even more readily apparent.

Example: Basic application of Low Block against a frontal double-hand grab

So, through a very quick analysis of the motion of the low block, we are already shown a variety of uses for this “block.”  When we push deeper into our analysis, though, we find that this is only the tip of the proverbial iceberg.
            We must move on to stage two of our verbal device: “a block is a strike.”  For the purposes of this thesis we will define a strike as any technique that is used to intentionally inflict damage by attacking a traditional vital point. When we look further at the motion of the low block, we can easily extrapolate that it can be used not only to stop an oncoming attack, but also as an attack itself.  By simply extending the range of the technique in relation to an opponent, we will find ourselves making contact with the fist, rather that with the forearm.  The so-called “low block” has now become a technique with which black belts will be familiar: the hammer fist.  While a hammer fist may not traditionally be held in this downward and side-oriented fashion, the effectiveness of the technique as a strike cannot be questioned.  It can be used to strike the inside of the knee, the shin, the ribs, the kidneys, the jaw, the throat, and virtually any other accessible vital point.

Example: Application of “low block” as a hammer fist strike to the jaw/throat

Again, though, we are merely scratching the surface.  By breaking down the arc of travel followed by the low block, we begin to see additional striking applications take shape.  The rising and falling action of the arm used to execute this technique yields a variety of elbow strikes, during both the initial preparatory upswing, and on the downswing, both of which become particularly useful if the opponent moves from a mid-range to close-range distance.
Further analysis will continue to yield an even greater number of possible strikes. For example, when taken to an advanced level, one low block may contain all of the following strikes, while assuming that the left hand is executing the “low block”.  Targets for each strike are dependent upon both the opponent’s reaction and the relational angle between you and the opponent.

  1. Moving into a standard “crossed arm/one arm up, one down” starting position, start by using the right hand to execute a punch to the opponent’s ribs, kidney, or solar plexus.



2.   Immediately following this initial punch, the opponent’s head will begin to move forward.  Execute a left handed uppercut punch across the neck, jaw, or temple. 

 
  1. On the upswing described in step 2 above, also execute a rising elbow/ forearm strike with the left arm to the opponent’s armpit, elbow, neck or jaw.

  1. Use the “chambering action” of the right arm to strike with the thumb knuckle, finger knuckles (backfist) or Radial side of the forearm to the opponent’s ribs or kidneys.

  1. As the left arm begins to descend into the low block, use the back of the elbow to strike the opponent’s philtrum, nose, eye, or jaw. Note: Photo is shown from opposite side for best view.

6. Finish the left hand downswing into “low block” by executing a hammer fist to the opponent’s nose, philtrum, jaw, neck, or temple.



While it is not suggested that this exact sequence of strikes will all be landed on an opponent, the progression of strikes does teach a very valuable idea: If one strike is blocked, the next strike should already be on its way.  Working on this drill with a partner may reveal even more striking opportunities, but even in this one exercise, we have now identified six new characteristics of the “low block” which many black belts may have never considered.  We are now starting to see with black belt eyes, but there is still more to discover.
Both the blocking and striking applications of the low block reveal more about the technique, and as we progress into the six-step striking drill listed above, we begin to uncover a vital characteristic of the technique that is often incorrectly ignored: Both hands must be considered when identifying applications for a given technique.  This idea leads us into step three in our exploration of low block: A block is a strike is a trap.  A Trap will be defined as a technique that catches or ensnares any of an attacker’s extremities by   compressing it between two bodily surfaces.  While not precluded from doing so, a trap does not automatically inflict pain; nor does it automatically immobilize an opponent. Traps usually come in one of three varieties: Leg traps, arm traps, and head/ neck traps, which are usually referred to as chokes.    How does the low block become a trap?  We must not only consider the use of both hands at this stage, but also the again reexamine the “starting position” of the technique.  Typically, a low block will be executed from one of two starting positions, each of which can be found in the pages of the Mooyae Dobo Tongji.

1.      The crossed arm/ one arm up, one arm down position




2.      The raised X position




 

Either of these starting positions can serve as an ideal trap.  The first of these two variations lends itself best to several different leg traps:

  1. Hook the rising arm underneath the attacker’s kick, while simultaneously pressing downward on the top or side of the leg with the descending arm.

  1. Using both forearms, bring the descending arm to the inside of the leg, while using the rising arm on the outside of the leg to compress the kick between each arm.

  1. From position 2 above, pull up with the downward arm to the “chamber” position, while simultaneously grabbing the leg.  Use the other arm to swing down into the standard “low block” position and trap the leg.


Similarly, when we look at the raised X starting position, we see that it lends itself to trapping the attacker’s arm, which is compressed between each of the defender’s forearms.  This trap can be executed easily from either an Inside Line or Outside Line defense.

  1. Inside Line Trap
  1. Outside Line Trap

Finally, by examining the traps we have outlined above for both the leg and arm, we can easily extrapolate these applications into traps of the body, neck and throat, which can serve as effective immobilizing or choking techniques:


For the most part, though, when we look at the trapping applications of the “low block”, we find that we are only using a portion of the technique itself.  If we truly desire to apply the entire technique, we must again move up an additional level in our original verbal device: A block is a strike is a trap is a lock.  For our purposes, a Lock shall be defined as a technique that immobilizes the attacker by applying pressure to a specific joint or series of joints in a manner that will hyperextend the joint beyond its normal range of motion, usually, but not always, resulting in pain. There are a diverse number of different types of locks; some straightforward and relatively simple in their execution, and some more esoteric and difficult.  Fortunately, the low block lends itself to one of the most well known locks: the arm bar.  An arm bar typically in some way grabs the attacker’s wrist, while applying pressure to and hyperextending the elbow, the shoulder, or both.  To apply the low block as a locking technique, execute the following steps:

1.         Start by blocking the attacker’s arm with the “Raised X” starting position for low block.  This can be done from either the Inside Line or Outside Line.


2.    Grab the wrist with the “chambering” arm, pulling to extend the attacker’s arm straight, while simultaneously using the elbow of the “blocking” arm to lock the attacker’s elbow joint.


3.      Bring the “blocking” arm down in the standard arcing fashion to execute a low block, while continuing to pull the “chambering” arm in towards the ribcage.  As the “blocking” arm descends, it should maintain pressure on the attacker’s elbow and/or shoulder.


While the above application of the low block as an arm bar is probably the easiest lock to execute for this technique, it is far from the only lock one can apply to low block.  Remembering that a lock applies pressure to a joint or series of joints in order to hyperextend these joints and cause pain, we may pick a different set of joints to lock.  In this case we will choose the elbow and the neck.  Here with proper execution of the low block, the elbow is hyperextended and immobilized by applying pressure with the defender’s body, rather than using the arms, while the neck is rotated to the side and locked by applying pressure with the descending arm along the jaw line.  Note here that the spine may also be considered a joint, and that by further extending the “low block”, we can lock the spine against the defender’s front leg/knee.


    We are starting to truly utilize all parts of the low block as we delve into these locking applications, but there is still one more kind of application to explore: A block is a strike is a trap is a lock is a throw.  A Throw will be defined as any technique which both garbs and releases the attacker in one continuous motion, while disrupting the attacker’s balance causing them to fall to the ground.  Once again, there are numerous different throwing applications for the low block, but we will only examine one in detail here.  For this final application of the “low block”, we will utilize a chokehold attack from the rear, in this case with the attacker placing her right forearm across the defender’s neck :


  1. The defender will bring his right arm upward to grab and rotate the attacker’s wrist, thereby freeing the airway:

  1. The defender will shift his left leg behind the attacker, while beginning to drive the left elbow back into the attacker’s body. Simultaneously, the defender will begin to use the “chambering” action of the right arm to pull the attacker’s arm off the shoulder, thus avoiding the possibility of being pulled down himself.

  1. The defender will pivot his hips to the left, while maintaining pressure on the attacker’s body with the left elbow, and will begin to swing the left arm down into the low block position, sliding the arm along the attacker’s body toward the head, knocking her backwards.

  1. Finally, the defender will continue to pivot his hips forward while applying downward pressure on the attacker, driving her to the ground.

While it is difficult to convey this application using static photographs, when it is executed at speed, it is a dynamic throw that quickly lifts the attacker off her feet and sends her sprawling to the ground.  Astute black belt students may even notice that this technique directly correlates to other techniques they already know. Reflection upon this will help them to build bridges towards even more Advanced Concepts.           

Concepts, Not Techniques?
 
            At this point, the reader may be asking, “Isn’t this really just teaching a bunch of new, albeit more advanced, techniques?”  This is actually a difficult question to answer.  From a certain point of view, yes this is true. We really can’t escape from teaching techniques to our students if we wish them to learn how to apply their art.  However, as Obi-Wan Kenobi says in The Empire Strikes Back, “many of the truths we cling to depend greatly on our own point of view."  It is equally accurate to say that all of the above applications are encompassed within only one technique.  The difference is really one of both focus and scope.  The focus, or area of concentration is shifted away from the memorization and repetition of these techniques. It is instead centered on the concept that one technique has many different uses, functions, and applications. By focusing on the concept rather than the techniques encapsulated within that concept, we find that the students’ retention of the drills actually increases, and that they are able to now improvise by applying the same ideas presented to new techniques, which brings us to the subject of scope.
            The scope of this curriculum is actually beyond our ability to document and categorize.  Throughout this chapter, we have touched on only one technique.  Students must now be asked to reflect on the presented drills for low block, examine their level of Understanding of the material presented, and identify some of the concepts discovered.  In so doing we actually discover that the verbal device we have used throughout our exploration of low block is actually an Advanced Concept itself:


A Block is a Strike is a Trap is a Lock is a Throw

When we analyze, deconstruct, and then reconstruct this concept, though, we also learn that:

A Strike is a Trap is a Lock is a Throw is a Block

A Trap is a Lock is a Throw is a Block is a Strike

A Lock is a Throw is a Block is a Strike is a Trap

A Throw is a Block is a Strike is a Trap is a Block

Even this does not cover the concept adequately.  What we really begin to see is not possible to depict in words or pictures, but perhaps this comes close:


Once students begin to display even some Understanding of this Advanced Concept, they can then begin to Apply the drills we have done for low block to another technique such as high block or inside to outside block, and in so doing will then begin to Improvise entirely new applications and drills of their own, while keeping in mind that along the way, we tend to discover Basic Concepts as well, such as:

  1. If one strike is blocked, the next strike should already be on its way.
  2. Both hands must be considered when identifying applications for a given technique.
The Conceptual Model: Conclusions

Once our black belts begin to embrace the Conceptual Model for a new Curriculum,  they can begin to move closer towards the Ideal Concept.  What is the Ideal Concept of Tang Soo Do?  It is, of course, our ultimate goal: to become one with nature.  Perhaps this means something different to everyone, but it does not make it any less ideal, and I think that even when exploring the Ideal, we do some away with some universal truths.  One of these is that in order for our techniques to truly become natural, we must move away from the idea that everything we do must somehow be categorized, classified, and compartmentalized.  We must instead begin to realize that in truth, everything we do in Tang Soo Do is directly related to, and inextricably linked with, everything else we do in Tang Soo Do.  In other words: It’s all the same.  Everything we do is actually the same as everything else we do, whether this is techniques in drill, performing hyung, practicing one-steps, or sparring.  It’s ALL the same.
          Getting black belts to really understand this, though, is no easy task.  For this reason, we must continue to deconstruct the Ideal Concept into easier to understand Basic Concepts (most useful at the Gup Levels), and the more difficult, but also more valuable Advanced Concepts that are crucial to the black belt’s development.  We have previously in this chapter defined a concept as it relates to Tang Soo Do as an idea of a technique formed by mentally combining all its characteristics or particulars; the conjunction of all the characteristic features of a technique.
         We must move beyond even this definition as we continue to move forward.  It is time to start substituting other areas of our curriculum for the word “technique.”  We actually must start with:


An idea of ______ formed by mentally combining all its characteristics or particulars; the conjunction of all the characteristic features of  ______.



We must fill in the blanks with whatever subject matter we plan to explore.  Perhaps we use “hyung”, or “dae ryun”; “ho sin sul”, “kyuck pa”, or “il soo sik”.  The possibilities, and therefore the concepts, are limitless.



Kick. Punch. Easy Stuff.